<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.marinrankedvoting.org">
<channel>
 <title>Marin Ranked Voting - Ranked Voting</title>
 <link>http://www.marinrankedvoting.org/taxonomy/term/37/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Why Ranked Voting?</title>
 <link>http://www.marinrankedvoting.org/Analysis/RankedVoting</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;cite&gt;This is a preliminary version of our presentation of ranked voting.&lt;/cite&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Problem: Winner-Take-All&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In single-winner elections (executive offices and single-member legislative districts), our traditional plurality voting rules allow candidates supported by a minority of voters to win, if the rest of the community is divided among more than one alternative candidate. Plurality elections result in legislative bodies that over-represent some groups and under-represent others. And they leave every voter who didn’t vote for the single winner in his or her district unrepresented.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.marinrankedvoting.org/taxonomy/term/37">Ranked Voting</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 12:02:45 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
